A visual reconstruction of the Harus, based on the single-witness account of Austrian contactee Albert Tomschi.
THINK ABOUTIT’S ALIEN TYPE SUMMARY
Harus
Austrian contactee Albert Tomschi described meeting beings from a planet called Harus, and separately from a planet called Kara or Krak — peaceful, vegetarian, and reptilian-Grey-human hybrids who created a simplified “space language” for interstellar communication. Decades later, when a researcher tried to follow up with Tomschi directly, he had nothing more to say about it.
Name: Harus
AKA: Planet Krak Hybrids — a reasonable descriptive label. “The Space Language Travelers” is not a term used verbatim in the source but is a fair paraphrase.
Location – Home System: Planet Harus, with a separately claimed contact from beings of planet Kara/Krak (both spellings appear in the source), per Tomschi’s account.
Distance from Earth: The source material states explicitly that no astronomical data is available for this case.
Attitude: Described in the source as very peace-loving and highly developed.
Motives: Not elaborated beyond peaceful contact and the development of a shared communication tool.
Physical Appearance: Per the source, described as hybrids combining reptilian (snake/lizard), Grey, and human phenotypes.
- Average Height: Not reported in any source.
- Average Weight: Not reported in any source.
- Body Temperature: Not reported in any source.
- Pulse/Respiration: Not reported in any source.
- Blood Pressure: Not reported in any source.
- Life Expectancy: Not reported in any source.
- Hair: Not reported in any source.
- Skin: Not given specific color/texture description in the source beyond the general reptilian-Grey-human hybrid framing.
- Eyes: Not reported in any source.
- Sex: Not addressed in the source.
Other Physical Information: Not reported in any source.
Special Traits and Abilities: Not reported in any source beyond their development of the “space language” discussed below.
Communication Type: Per the source: because the Krak language is difficult to learn, the Harus developed a simplified “space language” using easier, more comprehensible sounds, which the source describes as having become a compulsory subject in school and among the most widely spoken languages in the universe, per the claim.
Origin: Planet Harus, with secondary contact from Kara/Krak, per the source.
Life Form Type: Hybrid (reptilian/Grey/human), per the source.
Subspecies: Not reported in any source.
Most Common Species: Not reported in any source.
Level of Species: Not reported in any source.
Habits: Predominantly vegetarian, per the source.
Transportation Type: Not reported in any source.
Witnesses Reports: Albert Tomschi, an Austrian contactee, is the sole documented witness for this case, described in his own book, I Come From Planet Harus. The Universe Is Calling. Wendelle Stevens investigated the case and considered Tomschi a reliable witness. However, a later researcher who approached Tomschi directly for follow-up found him evasive, stating he had nothing to say about the case — a significant credibility detail present in the source material. This remains a single-witness, uncorroborated case with no independent physical evidence.
Special Features/Characteristics: Per the source, the Harus and Krak are said to be sometimes confused with a separately claimed hostile reptilian group from “planet Mohrosh,” in a star cluster called “Sychorus” — a cluster name the source notes does not correspond to any recognized astronomical designation.
Summary/Description: A peaceful, vegetarian, reptilian-Grey-human hybrid species described by Austrian contactee Albert Tomschi, credited with creating a simplified “space language” for interstellar communication.
Source: Albert Tomschi, I Come From Planet Harus. The Universe Is Calling.; investigation by Wendelle Stevens. No astronomical data exists for this case, and the sole witness became unwilling to discuss it when approached directly by a later researcher.
Related Cases: Errans, another single-contactee case in this archive with comparatively more extensive documentation.
DETAILED REPORT
The Harus entry’s descriptive core matches the sourced Albert Tomschi contactee case closely. The most important correction was restoring what the source itself states plainly: no astronomical data exists for this case at all, making the prior draft’s specific distance figure an invention rather than an estimate of something documented.
A significant credibility detail was also missing from the prior draft: when a researcher later approached Tomschi directly to follow up on his own case, he was evasive and had nothing further to say. That detail belongs alongside Wendelle Stevens’ contemporaneous assessment of Tomschi as reliable — both are part of an honest accounting of this case’s credibility, not just the more favorable one.
RESEARCHER’S NOTES
Albert Tomschi — A Reliable Witness Who Later Went Quiet
- Source Chain Assessment: A single named contactee (Tomschi) with a published book anchors this entry; Wendelle Stevens’ contemporaneous investigation adds a note of assessed reliability, complicated by the witness’s later reluctance to discuss the case.
- Classification Correction: The fabricated distance figure was removed and replaced with the source’s own explicit statement that no astronomical data exists.
- Pattern Context: A witness later declining to discuss their own claimed case is a recurring credibility signal worth weighing consistently across this archive’s single-contactee entries, not selectively applied.
- Evidentiary Weight: A single witness, one contemporaneous investigator’s assessment, and no independent physical evidence — a modest evidentiary floor, honestly stated.
- Geographic/Historical Context: Not applicable; no terrestrial location is central to this case beyond Tomschi’s own residence in Austria.
The honest record: a single Austrian contactee’s account, considered reliable by one contemporaneous investigator, who later declined to discuss his own case when a researcher followed up — both facts belong in this entry, not just the more flattering one.
The source states plainly that when later approached, Tomschi “had nothing to say about the case” — the single most load-bearing credibility detail in this entry, presented above as reported fact rather than as an invented direct quotation.



